Friday, December 9, 2016
Google has been in the smart phone game for some time, dating back to the original G1 and man, has it come a long way. In the past Google has partnered with other manufacturers to design and release their annual flagship Nexus devices. While these were the purest implementation of Android regarding software sometimes the hardware was finicky, had performance issues or simply weren’t readily available in a retail environment. In a time when people still preferred signing contracts with their providers and didn’t want to “pay” for their phones the Nexus devices, while great phones, often struggled to gain mind share.
Enter the Pixel and Pixel XL by Google, two new handsets designed to power Google and Android into the next generation of smartphones. With both devices they have taken what has made the Nexus series so defining and reinvented them for greater mass appeal. We’re not saying the Nexus phones were unpopular, far from it, but they never achieved the critical mass of something like an iPhone or Galaxy device. There are some gambles made, one or two corners cut and a bevy of new and exciting features that, when combined, make for one of the best mobile devices we’ve ever used.
This review is a bit different than others you may watch. I purchased the Pixel XL online and if I didn't like the device I was going to return it and return to using my Samsung Galaxy Note 5. The Pixel XL is not an inexpensive device so for me to make a commitment to it this phone needed to wow me. And wow it did as this is now my daily driver.
Why it RoX!
- Fast, Fast, Super-Fast and Snappy!
- Excellent build quality
- The camera is damn good
- Phenomenal Battery Life
- Category-defining ear piece fidelity
- Google Assistant is a great evolution of Google Now
- UNLIMITED Cloud backup of photos
- Available through carriers and Google Play world-Wide
What Could Make it Better
- Phones this expensive need waterproofing
- No micro SD Card Slot
- Stock Android Apps are meh at best, such as dialer and contacts
- No Induction Charging
- The Pixel Launcher is good but no option to folder items in your app drawer
- Android Pay doesn’t match Samsung Pay
Wednesday, November 30, 2016
Something most Netflix users have been requesting for some time is finally here - Offline Viewing! How does it work? How easy is it to use? Does it take forever to download? Follow along as we walk you through exactly how the process works on our Google Pixel XL.
I’ve been a huge fan of the Google Chromecast since the first one debuted in 2013. As someone who, at the time, did not own a smart TV, let alone a 4K TV, the original Chromecast made it quicker and easier to consume content without requiring I fire up my PlayStation 3 or Playstation 4. Casting Netflix, YouTube, HBO Go and other services from my phone or tablet to my TV was easy and seamless. While there were quirks with the original Chromecast the 2015 update added 5GHz support and faster internals to make Chromecasts even better. Google is back at it with the Chromecast Ultra and, while it pains me to say this as someone who currently owns 6 Chromecasts, I see little if any reason to purchase this version over its predecessor.
When the original Chromecast came out more than three years ago the install base of smart TVs was significantly smaller. Estimates are that only 22-million households had a smart TV of some type where in 2016 estimates are that number will have nearly doubled to over 40-million households. When you figure that there are roughly 125-million total households in the USA that means almost a third of all households have at least one smart TV which eliminates the need for a separate streaming dongle.
Next is the main features of the Chromecast Ultra, the compatibility with 4K and HDR content, is meaningless to a majority of users. I’m not saying that 4K or HDR aren’t great features, they’re amazing, however the amount of 4K content is not significant enough at this time. Netflix and Amazon Prime offer limited amounts of 4K content and with each you’ll have to pay an additional fee per month. YouTube offers free 4K content but are you really going to spend hours watching cat videos in 4K? Me either. Additionally, one of the biggest demographic for those buying Chromecasts are people who don’t have Smart TVs, right? The odds are pretty high that if you don’t have a Smart TV you’re not going to have a 4K or HDR-compatible set. Similarly to those considering a PS4 Slim versus a PS4 Pro, if you can’t take advantage of the higher resolution output from the PS4 Pro you’re spending money you don’t need to spend when you can get all the same benefits to you out of the PS4 Slim. Those uber-cheap 50” black Friday TVs that you will get for under $200? Not only are they not a smart TV but likely locked maxed out at either a 720P or 1080P resolution. Buying a Chromecast Ultra to televisions such as these adds functionality you won’t see any benefit from.
And for those who happen to have 4K and HDR Smart televisions and are thinking about picking up a Chromecast Ultra I would ask you to become more familiar with your smartphone, tablet and Smart TV. I have a Samsung Note 5, Tab S2 8” and a Samsung 60” Ultra HD 4K HDR television. I can use the cast functionality built into my phone and tablet to cast any content to my television I could have done to a Chromecast. Again, there’s no need to add redundant functionality that’s build into my television.
In the end I can’t see a niche the Chromecast Ultra fills. If you have a 4K TV you more than likely have the apps and functionality already built-in. And with more and more devices being plugged into your TV (I have a PS4, Wii U & DirecTV receiver leaving me with just 1 more open port) there’s no need to take up precious HDMI ports with redundant functionality. If you absolutely want a Chromecast I’d highly recommend the 2015 version, it will do everything you’ll need it to for nearly half the cost of the Chromecast Ultra.
Wednesday, April 29, 2015
Since those times Sprint has made a lot of changes. They've launched many network initiatives and even launched Dan Hesse from his position as CEO of the company. With an influx of cash from new owner Softbank and a more spectrum holdings than the competition could Sprint really make a comeback?
A brief history
Sprint wasn't always a nationwide wireless carrier. They got their start when the Government broke up monopoly in the landline phone business and companies had to compete for customers, Sprint becoming one of the larger providers of Long Distance. In 1997 Sprint PCS launched with a different approach to wireless than what traditional "cellular" companies were doing. Sprint, along with competitor PrimeCo in my area, did away with the concept of a contract, gave you more minutes, eliminated activation fees and, unlike "Cellular" phones they were "Digital" promising far better security and sound quality.
Over the years Sprint continued to expand and push new technologies. Sprint launched their "Sprint Vision" 3G services which provided real, usable internet connectivity right on your device. They then increased their bandwidth several times, making the connection better and faster. In an effort to grow they bought other wireless carriers, first starting at the regional level but eventually they gobbled up competitor Nextel. This was one of the first stumbling blocks for Sprint as Nextel used a very different iDen network which had 0-compatibility with Sprint's CDMA services. From this point on Sprint struggled to maintain 2 vastly different networks, botching both of them. Then came the WiMax debacle which put the company behind the 8-ball. a majority of Sprint customers never saw WiMax in their area, myself included. In the meantime Verizon embraced LTE, AT&T and T-Mobile first moved to HSPA+ which was a more natural progression from their existing EDGE and 3G services before also moving into the LTE arena. The last to the party was Sprint and it hurt them. Badly.
For myself I began as a Sprint Customer in 1998, the week after Ari Lyendyke won the Indy 500 in the Sprint PCS-sponsored car. I stayed with Sprint, for the most part, until 2011. I loved my unlimited data package, the fact that I could buy a new phone at any time, there were no activation fees and the service worked. In 2005 all this started to change for me. My service began to suffer as I relocated to a more rural area. My data connection started being more inconsistent. I couldn't upgrade my devices as often and I was now being forced into contracts and had to pay device activation fees. But still I stuck with Sprint because they supported my device, a Palm Pre. But then Palm users felt the pangs as the Pre+, Pre2, Veer and Pre3 never came to Sprint, instead being sold through Verizon and AT&T. Even my plan which was cheap started to climb. Much like Anakin Skywalker Sprint had become the very thing they sought to bring an end to. I eventually moved my service to US Cellular who, ironically, sold their spectrum holdings in my region to Sprint. Forced to change carriers I moved to AT&T which is what I use today. However all is not happy with AT&T which is why I did what I thought I'd never do again. I gave Sprint another shot.
Data is a huge concern for me and AT&T in my area is really spotty. I can't even use my phone in one of the main restaurants that we frequent for work lunches as AT&T just doesn't work. I had also bought a Samsung Galaxy Note 3 when I moved to AT&T and, while a great device, the AT&T version has been borked since launch. Don't believe me? Search for Note 3 AT&T issues and see the pages of stories. Go ahead, I'll wait. As such I wanted a new device and the Samsung Galaxy S6 was going to be it. Now I could have gotten it on AT&T on a Next plan however I didn't want to see my bill go up by $32 a month. Sprint had gotten my attention with their "Cut your bill in 1/2" offers and, before the cost of devices, Sprint was going to match my unlimited talk, text and 15GB of data with tethering for 3 lines for under $65 a month. My thought was if Sprint was at-least equal to AT&T I'd be ahead because my bill would be considerably less, even when you factor in the cost of 3 new phones. With this in-mind I went into the local store and signed up for 3-lines of service through Sprint to test out for 14-days.
As I stated I wanted a Galaxy S6 so that's exactly what I went with. My wife has a Galaxy S5 but was intrigued by the S6 so she went with one as-well. Finally my daughter had been using a Moto E and I wanted a lower-cost device for her. I found what I thought was a good match in the HTC One E8. Because I wasn't sure if I was going to keep the service or not the rep set us up on 3 $80/mo Unlimited Talk/Text/Data plans with temporary numbers. This way we didn't have to turn-in our phones or port our numbers, two items that would greatly complicate things if we didn't keep Sprint service.
Testing took place in and around the east-Central Illinois area, within a 30-mile radius of Champaign, IL. This is listed on Sprint's Coverage area as featuring their Spark service which every store rep called "LTE on Steroids". I think this must be something handed down from corporate because every-single employee I spoke with used this same analogy. I also drove from Champaign to Chicago and up to my home stomping grounds of Milwaukee, Wi. We tested all three phones inside and out, in rural and suburban areas and in just about every environment you can imagine.
From the word-go I really liked some of the new features Sprint had added to their services. Unlike AT&T and Verizon Sprint enables WiFi calling on all their smartphones. This means if you have WiFi at-home you'll never need a microcell. Ever. Call quality, which was never an issue even back in the day on Sprint, was the best I have ever used on a cell phone thanks to their HD-calling. It was eerie how clear talking between the three phones was, and we didn't need to be on WiFi to see the benefits. The calls were crisp, clear and understandable. This had to be too good to be true. And unfortunately that ended up being the case.
One of the reasons I spent so much time talking about the Data side of Sprint's network is because it is still, unfortunately, the company's achilles heel unless you're in Chicago, New York, LA or any other top-10 market. Don't get me wrong, when Sprint Spark works it's exactly as promised. In areas of Champaign where I'd struggle to get any service I was consistently pulling down speedtests of 50-60mbps, often with only 1-2 bars of service. When I drove from Champaign to Milwaukee we streamed Pandora the entire 4-hour trip and it worked perfectly the entire time. No stuttering, no buffering, no drops. None. When I use AT&T to listen to baseball games using the MLB At Bat app there are stretches where I can go 3-to 10-minutes with buffering and stuttering issues. The Sprint service rocks at streaming audio.
So with all of this positive I must have made the switch, right? Well hang on there because all was not rainbows and unicorns. My wife's Galaxy S6 would not refresh her Facebook feed from the app unless it was connected to WiFi. She could do it from the web browser but not the official app. Oh, Samsung also decided to bake Facebook into the TouchWiz ROM meaning you can never properly delete the app and reinstall it from the Google Play store; you can simply uninstall all the updates and reinstall them. This problem was never resolved on her phone, however I rarely had an issue on my S6. The one time I did I was in Gibson City, IL at the Harvest Moon Twin Drive-In theater. I was streaming a baseball game via the MLB app perfectly before a movie and could not access anything else data-wise from my phone. Facebook, Twitter, the Chrome Browser, everything timed out. I disconnected the audio stream and it still didn't work, however I was able to reconnect to the audio feed without a hiccup. I don't know if this means that the Sprint network prioritizes streaming audio data packets differently and at a higher priority to standard data but that is the only explanation I could come up with.
The next set of issues occurred when the three of us attended a Milwaukee Brewers game at Miller Park. AT&T works decently in the "bowl" of the stadium but I couldn't get my S6 to work at all anywhere. This was especially frustrating because the phone showed 3 bars of signal and the Spark icon was active. Thankfully I was able to connect to the new WiFi service the team had added since last season so at least I could use the WiFi calling if we got separated. My Wife and Daughter had similar experiences at the park but not to the same extent.
The final straw came from the network's inconsistent performance. Our phones would bounce from Spark to 3G to LTE and back again without changing position. I realize that the more people ping a tower the less capacity it will have but the connections shouldn't be this volatile. It was really annoying to see happen but it didn't seem to affect things such as streaming audio that I have already covered. Facebook, Twitter, news sites and general browsing would go from super-fast to what I would call the Sprint of Old.
In the end we didn't stick with Sprint and wound up returning the phones. We really wanted this to work as the cheaper bill was appealing, the call quality was immeasurably better and the service was faster. We could not reconcile this with the fact that the Facebook app did not work at all on my wife's phone, I had no service connection inside Miller Park and the connection was very inconsistent. However I will say I was extremely impressed with how far Sprint had come since I had left them on October 2nd, 2011. Spark is for real and it's growing. Sprint has piqued my interest again and, as long as they keep promotions like the "Cut Your Bill In 1/2" and continue to expand I will be willing to give them another look in 6-months. They have more spectrum holdings than any other wireless provider which means they have a position of strength.
In the meantime I have swapped out my Note 3 for a Galaxy S6 on AT&T. It's still a great device but features such as WiFi calling are no-where to be found due to AT&T's gimping of the device and lack of support for the service. My service issues still exist even on the new phone however the GPS is leaps and bounds better than the Note 3. Perhaps I'll give Sprint another look sooner than later.
Monday, April 20, 2015
Whether we call it double sided tape, sticky tape or servo tape we have all used it from time to time. Often people don't use it properly and it causes the tape to fail prematurely. In this video we show you how to properly clean and prep an area for use with double sided tape and how to make sure your double sided tape adheres as well as possible.
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
You have a nice, new, shiny smart phone, you know, the kind with ALLLLLLL the bells and whistles? 47,000,000MP camera, 1.21 Gigawhat battery, a personal assistant that says "Hi" to you in that all too seductive way? You're not going to just run around with that thing naked all day, are you? Of course not, but you also don't want to have your ultra-thin smartphone as thick as your last-generation smartphone. In working on our upcoming review of the Samsung Galaxy S6 we wanted to make sure all that gorgeous glass and aluminum was protected. That's where the Spigen Slim Armor Kickstand case comes into play.
RoXolid Review Specs
Who Makes It - Spigen
What Is It - TPU and Polycarbonate Kickstand Case
Colors - Blue Topaz, Champagne Gold, Gunmetal, Mint, Shimmery White
MSRP - $29.99
I ended ordered two different colors of the Slim Armor cases, one in Gunmetal and one in Blue Topaz. Both arrived in days, actually a day earlier than anticipated and before the Galaxy S6 was released. I was a bit disappointed that the kickstand "nub" on the Gunmetal kickstand was actually broken out of the box. No worries though as a quick email to Spigen resulted in a replacement (actually 4) being sent out. That's great customer service!
While it may appear that the kickstand snaps into the molded back it actually just rests there. When the phone is in the TPU and the back is on the pressure fit of the phone keeps the kickstand in-place. It seemed a bit odd but we'll see in-testing if it works or not.
There are a ton of ways to test a cell case. There are drop tests, scratch tests, throw your phone off the roof like an idiot test but for this test I thought "hey, why don't I just use it", so I did. Before I left the store with my shiney new precious I put the Slim Armor on it. The fit couldn't have been any better. It was snug enough that I didn't feel like the phone was going to fall out but I could also remove the phone if need be quickly and easily. I even discovered that I could remove the phone from the case without removing the molded backing in a pinch.
The volume and power buttons on the Slim Armor are really one of the shining spots on this case. They protect the buttons without inhibiting your access to them. I could easily feel my way along the case to raise or lower the volume or turn the phone on or off without having to look and search for them on the phone. At least for the most part. Coming from a Note 3 the Galaxy S6's power button is in a different location so I find myself reaching higher on the phone to power it on or off, but that's me just having to get used to the phone versus a defect or problem in the case.
At the end of the day I would honestly recommend the Spigen Slim Armor Case to anyone, not only with a Galaxy S6 but with any phone that the company makes one for.It is a great blend of materials and functional design that doesn't leave you feeling like you've buried your phone in something hideous. While it was disappointing that one kickstand was broken out of the box I was very impressed by how well Spigen handled my issue and sent out not just one replacement but several. This was my first experience with Spigen and after this experience it won't be my last. At almost $30 on the Spigen site it may be a little much for a TPU-based case but there are deals to be had for the savvy shopper out there. You invest a lot of money in a smart phone, you should spend a little coin to protect it too and with the Spigen Slim Armor you definitely get what you pay for!
Value - 7
Quality - 9
Performance - 9
Overall - 9